+44 204 577 2699
English Deutsch
Log in

Eight Agiloft alternatives worth a shortlist.

Agiloft is a configurable enterprise CLM built on a no-code platform, with signing delegated to DocuSign or Adobe Sign and pricing on request. These are the Agiloft alternatives and competitors teams move to when they want signing in the same system and a shorter road to go-live than Agiloft's own 14-week timeline.

Start free trial Get a demo
4.9
4.8
By Felix Scholz, fynkLast reviewed Features and pricing checked against vendor pages

The short version.

  1. fynk if you want contracts and eIDAS signatures in one European system, set up self-serve instead of in a 14-week project.
  2. Ironclad if you have an in-house legal team, complex workflows and Salesforce-driven contracting, and want signing built in.
  3. Icertis if you need one contracting system across procurement, sales and legal with deep SAP, Salesforce or Microsoft integration.
  4. Juro if sales, HR and legal draft and agree contracts together in the browser.
  5. Tomorro or Contractbook if you want a mid-market CLM hosted in the EU with native signing included.

Still the right call if your contract process is too specific for an out-of-the-box tool and you have budget for a partner-led rollout: Agiloft itself. Here is when we say so.

More than 3,000 teams chose fynk to outgrow legal chaos.

Nobody leaves Agiloft because it cannot be configured.

  1. Go-live is a project.

    Agiloft's own implementation timeline runs from discovery workshops in weeks 1 to 4 to go-live in week 14. For a mid-sized team, that is a lot of project before the first contract moves.

  2. The price is a conversation.

    The CLM pricing page is a quote request form with no rates on it. The only published prices are for Astra, Agiloft's separate AI product, so budgeting and side-by-side comparisons wait for a sales cycle.

  3. Signing needs a second vendor.

    Agiloft has no native e-signature. Contracts are signed through a DocuSign or Adobe Sign integration, and an Adobe Sign account used with Agiloft must be dedicated to it, which means a second licence and a second contract.

  4. German beyond the language files.

    Agiloft supplies German language files, but the text specific to your system, such as tables, fields and actions, has to be translated per system. For DACH teams, a German interface becomes part of the configuration work.

Side by side

The shortlist at a glance.

ToolBest forFromAI analysisEU hostingE-signature
fynkEuropean teams that want contracts, AI and eIDAS signing (up to QES) in one system with transparent per-user pricingFrom €19 per user/month (annual)IncludedYes (EEA)SES, AES, QES
IroncladEnterprise and upper mid-market companies with in-house legal teams and complex, high-volume contract workflows, especially Salesforce-driven sales contractingPricing on requestYes, extraction includedEU region, add-onSES, AES
Icertislarge enterprises with complex buy-side and sell-side contracting, deep SAP, Salesforce or Microsoft integration needs and budget for a multi-month implementationOn requestIncluded (Vera)Via DocuSign/Adobe/Namirial
JuroMid-sized companies where sales, HR and legal create and agree contracts in the browserOn requestYes, all plansYes, IrelandAES native, QES via Docusign
Tomorroin-house legal teams at mid-sized European companies that want a French or EU-hosted CLM and pay only for contract creatorsOn requestCredit-cappedYes (France)SES native
Contractbooksmall and mid-sized Nordic and European teams that want drafting, AES signing and an AI-assisted repository in one toolOn requestIncludedYes (EU, GCP)SES, AES
OneflowNordic and European mid-market teams sending sales and HR contracts€50 / user / monthYes, summary and extractYes, IrelandSES, AES/QES add-on
DocuSignOrganisations that mainly need high-volume e-signature with broad integrations and international legal acceptance€38 per user/month (Business Pro, annual)Summaries; analysis in IAMEU region, guarantee on EnhancedSES; AES and QES extra

Prices as listed for the plan a typical team would buy, in the vendor's currency. Each cell is checked against the vendor's own pages; links and check dates are in the references below.

The alternatives in detail.

Same shape for every entry: what it is, where it wins, where it does not, who should shortlist it.

fynk

01 fynk

European teams that want contracts, AI and eIDAS signing (up to QES) in one system with transparent per-user pricing

Get a demo

This is our page, so read this section with that in mind. fynk is a contract platform with e-signature built in, not a signature tool with contract features bolted on. Every document is read on arrival, so parties, dates, values and notice periods come back as structured data.

Where it wins

  • Contract management and signing in one subscription
  • EU hosted by default, ISO 27001
  • SES, AES and QES on every plan
  • Self-serve setup, a free plan and a 14-day trial

Where it does not

  • Less brand recognition outside Europe
  • API and native HubSpot integration only from the Business plan
  • No notarisation and no SOC 2 report
  • Too much tool under five contracts a year
From €19 per user/month (annual)

02 Ironclad

Enterprise and upper mid-market companies with in-house legal teams and complex, high-volume contract workflows, especially Salesforce-driven sales contracting

An enterprise CLM with deep workflow configuration, built for in-house legal teams handling complex, high-volume contracting, especially from Salesforce. It expects a named owner and an implementation project.

Where it wins

  • Workflow depth at enterprise scale
  • AI extraction and an assistant across the repository
  • Native Salesforce and HubSpot integrations

Where it does not

  • Pricing on request, sales-led only
  • Implementation takes weeks rather than days
  • EU hosting is a paid region add-on
Pricing on request

03 Icertis

large enterprises with complex buy-side and sell-side contracting, deep SAP, Salesforce or Microsoft integration needs and budget for a multi-month implementation

An enterprise contract lifecycle platform on Microsoft Azure, covering drafting, negotiation, the repository and obligation tracking, with the Vera AI layer across the portfolio. It suits large organisations with complex buy-side and sell-side contracting and the budget for a multi-month implementation.

Where it wins

  • Clause library, multi-step approvals, obligations and renewals
  • Vera AI for playbook review, extraction and portfolio Q&A
  • ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2 and native Salesforce, Dynamics 365 and SAP connectors

Where it does not

  • Pricing on request, sales-led only
  • No native e-signature, signing runs through DocuSign, Adobe or Namirial
  • Implementation is measured in months
On request

04 Juro

Mid-sized companies where sales, HR and legal create and agree contracts in the browser

A browser-based CLM for companies where sales, HR and legal create and agree contracts together: a native editor, conditional approvals, a searchable repository and native advanced signatures, priced by contract volume.

Where it wins

  • Browser-native editor with redlining
  • EU hosted in Ireland, SOC 2 Type II
  • AI assistant across the repository

Where it does not

  • Pricing on request, sales-led only
  • QES only through a DocuSign integration
  • Public API only on Enterprise
On request

05 Tomorro

in-house legal teams at mid-sized European companies that want a French or EU-hosted CLM and pay only for contract creators

A French contract lifecycle platform with a template editor, a counterparty portal for negotiation, approvals, native simple signatures and a repository with reminders. Its AI assistant Oro reviews contracts against playbooks and answers questions across the repository, metered by monthly credits.

Where it wins

  • Drafting, negotiation, approvals, signing and tracking in one tool
  • Hosted in France, ISO 27001
  • Only admin and creator seats are charged

Where it does not

  • Pricing on request, with a 12-month commitment
  • Native signature is SES only, AES and QES through DocuSign
  • AI features draw on a monthly credit allowance
On request

06 Contractbook

small and mid-sized Nordic and European teams that want drafting, AES signing and an AI-assisted repository in one tool

A Danish contract management platform, part of the Swedish e-signature group Scrive since June 2025. It covers template-based drafting, in-app negotiation, SES and AES signing with Nordic eIDs, and an AI-assisted repository, sold as flat-fee plans with a yearly cap on signed contracts.

Where it wins

  • Drafting, counterparty redlining, signing and repository in one subscription
  • AI import with extraction, OCR search and reminders
  • EU hosting on Google Cloud, SOC 2 Type II

Where it does not

  • No QES, native signatures stop at AES
  • Signed contracts capped per year on every plan
  • API and Salesforce are paid add-ons
On request

07 Oneflow

Nordic and European mid-market teams sending sales and HR contracts

A Nordic contract platform built around sales and HR agreements, combining a document editor, signing, AI extraction and a repository in one subscription.

Where it wins

  • EU hosted in Ireland, ISO 27001
  • Contract management and signing in one subscription
  • Native HubSpot, Salesforce and Dynamics integrations

Where it does not

  • AES and QES through an eID add-on
  • AI playbook review is a beta add-on
  • SOC 2 Type 1 only
€50 / user / month

08 DocuSign

Organisations that mainly need high-volume e-signature with broad integrations and international legal acceptance

A widely used e-signature platform, with the repository, AI and contract lifecycle management sold as separate IAM plans. Worth a look if your Agiloft setup already signs through DocuSign and you would rather consolidate on the signing vendor than add another CLM.

Where it wins

  • Every eIDAS level, QES as an add-on from €10 per recipient
  • REST API on every eSignature plan
  • ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II and a German interface

Where it does not

  • Envelope allowance per user per year, overage billed
  • Repository, extraction and renewals need a separate IAM plan
  • AES, the data residency guarantee and Salesforce or Dynamics only on sales-led Enhanced plans
€38 per user/month (Business Pro, annual)
Buyer guide

What to look for in an Agiloft alternative.

Five questions decide most of these evaluations. Answer them before you book demos and the shortlist above collapses to two or three names.

How much configuration you actually need.

A no-code platform can model almost any process, but someone has to model it and keep it current. If your contracts follow a handful of standard paths, a tool that ships with those paths will be live sooner and needs less upkeep.

Whether signing is in the same subscription.

Some CLMs sign natively, others hand the document to a separate e-signature vendor. With the second model you manage two licences, two contracts and an integration between them, and the signature levels you get depend on the signing vendor’s plan.

What the price actually includes.

Three things separate the quote from the total cost: implementation services, the signing licence, and AI sold per credit or as a separate product. Ask for all three in the same number.

Where the data lives.

Agiloft lists AWS hosting in Ireland and Germany among its regions, alongside the US, Canada and Australia. Ask every vendor on your list which region is the default for new customers and which components process data outside it.

When Agiloft is still the right answer.

Worth saying plainly, since we sell against it. If your contract processes are too specific for an out-of-the-box tool and you want to model them in a configurable platform with a partner-led implementation, if you are already standardised on DocuSign or Adobe Sign, or if you need a native Salesforce app and a security posture covering SOC 1, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and ISO 27701, Agiloft covers that well. AI review against playbooks, data extraction and Ask AI are part of its current CLM base package.

Why teams pick fynk

Contracts and signatures, live the same week.

In Agiloft, signing runs through a separate DocuSign or Adobe Sign account, and go-live follows an implementation timeline of about 14 weeks. In fynk, SES, AES and QES are part of every plan, setup is self-serve, and every document is read on arrival: the dates and values come back as data you can filter and report on, and the assistant answers questions across the whole repository.

  • Contracts and eIDAS signatures in one subscription, no second product
  • EU hosted by default, ISO 27001
  • AI review and metadata extraction on every plan
  • Your signed archive imported and read on arrival
Start free trial Get a demo
Framework agreement, Nordwind Analytics Signed
  • Renewal date 31 March 2027
  • Notice period 3 months
  • Contract value €48,000 per year
  • Signature level QES

Which supplier contracts auto-renew before March?

Pricing

How Agiloft pricing actually behaves.

Agiloft does not publish a CLM price, so the useful question is not what it costs but which parts end up on the invoice. They are worth understanding before you compare any two quotes, including ours.

The CLM price is a quote.

Agiloft’s pricing page is a contact form with no rates, and the billing unit for the CLM is not published. Every evaluation starts with a demo and a quote.

The published prices are for Astra, not the CLM.

Astra, Agiloft’s AI product, is sold separately with public tiers: Free at $0 with 1,000 credits a month and up to three custom playbooks, Pro from $120 a month with 2,500 to 40,000 credits shared per workspace, and Advanced on request. Current CLM customers get Astra through the AI on the Inside package, so these prices are a reference point, not the CLM price.

Signing is a second invoice.

Agiloft integrates with DocuSign and Adobe Sign rather than signing natively. An existing DocuSign account can be connected; an Adobe Sign account must be dedicated to Agiloft. Either way, the signing licence sits outside the Agiloft quote.

Implementation is part of the cost.

Agiloft’s own timeline runs from discovery in weeks 1 to 4 through build, testing and training to go-live in week 14, and notes that timelines vary with complexity. Budget for that project alongside the licence.

What to ask for in writing.

Ask any vendor on your shortlist for the same three numbers: the total annual cost at your real contract volume including signing and AI, the implementation cost and time to go-live, and what the second and third year look like after any first-year discount. Those three answers reorder most shortlists more than any feature table does.

How to move without losing your archive.

  1. Export records and attachments.

    Agiloft exposes REST and SOAP APIs that can be used to pull contract records and their attached files. Plan the export with whoever maintains your configuration while the system is still live, and check signed copies in your DocuSign or Adobe Sign account too.

  2. Bulk import the archive.

    fynk reads each PDF and extracts parties, dates, values and terms, so the archive arrives searchable instead of as a folder dump.

  3. Rebuild templates, not documents.

    Move the five templates that cover most of your volume. The long tail can follow.

  4. Run both for one month.

    New contracts go to the new system, anything mid-signature finishes where it started.

After the switch

What teams report once contracts stop living in a folder.

TIME
80%

less spent on contract admin

PROCESSING
1h to 2m

to read a contract and extract its terms

DRAFTING
33%

faster to get a contract out the door

SCALE
3.000+

teams running contracts on fynk

"Looking back, I would say it worked quite well. We set up everything ourselves. We did not need any IT support."

Jörg Burkhardt Head of Sales & New Partnerships, 1. FC Nürnberg
References

Where these figures come from.

  • fynk [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
  • Ironclad [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
  • Icertis [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]
  • Juro [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
  • Tomorro [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24]
  • Contractbook [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
  • Oneflow [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
  • DocuSign [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
  • Agiloft [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]

Spotted a figure that has moved? Tell us at [email protected] and we will re-check the row.

Frequently asked questions.

  • Not natively. Agiloft CLM integrates with DocuSign and Adobe Sign for electronic signatures, so you need an account with one of them. An Adobe Sign account used with Agiloft must be dedicated to it, and the signature levels available depend on the signing vendor's plan.

  • Agiloft CLM pricing is on request; the pricing page is a quote form. The only published prices are for the separate Astra AI product: a free tier with 1,000 credits a month, Pro from $120 a month, and Advanced on request.

  • The closest like-for-like competitors are Icertis and Ironclad, enterprise CLMs with pricing on request and an implementation project. Teams that want signing built in and a shorter rollout shortlist fynk, Juro, Tomorro, Contractbook or Oneflow. If your Agiloft setup already signs through DocuSign, consolidating on DocuSign is a third route.

  • Yes. Agiloft documents REST and SOAP APIs in its help center, and the REST API uses OAuth 2.0 for authorisation. The same APIs are the usual route for exporting records and attachments when you migrate.

  • On Capterra, Agiloft holds 4.8 out of 5 from 39 reviews, checked on 25 September 2026. A rating averages very different configurations, so also ask for a reference customer whose processes resemble yours.

  • Agiloft's published implementation timeline runs about 14 weeks, from discovery workshops in weeks 1 to 4 to go-live in week 14, and the vendor notes that timelines vary with complexity.

  • Agiloft runs on AWS and lists Ireland and Germany among its hosting locations, alongside the US, Canada and Australia. EU hosting is an available region rather than a stated default, so confirm the region and any components processed elsewhere in the contract.

Still have questions?

Contact us
Markus
Brendan
Simon

Keep comparing.

Comparison

fynk vs Agiloft

Feature by feature, including signing, time to go-live and hosting.

Learn more Buyer guide

Best contract management software

The full category, ranked against stated criteria.

Learn more Alternatives

DocuSign alternatives

What teams move to when signing is only a third of the job.

Learn more Hub

All alternatives

Every tool we have compared, in one index.

Learn more

Take control of your agreements. Move your business forward.

Run agreements the way they should run: fast, clear, and on your terms.

Start for free
Get a demo
4.9
4.8