fynk and Agiloft both manage contracts from draft to renewal, and both include AI review. Agiloft fits organisations whose processes need a configurable no-code platform and a services-led rollout of about 14 weeks. fynk fits teams that want signing in the same subscription, published prices and a self-serve setup. Compared across contract management, AI, signatures, hosting, Agiloft pricing and implementation.
Contract management with e-signature and an AI assistant built in.
Configurable no-code CLM platform for enterprises, with AI contract review through its Astra product.
Grouped by the areas that decide these deals. Where a feature exists but runs through a separate product or a third-party integration, it is marked partial.
| Capability | fynk | Agiloft |
|---|---|---|
| Contract lifecycle | ||
| Central repository | Yes (Document hub) | Included |
| Redlining and negotiation | Yes | Via Word add-in |
| Approval workflows | Yes | Included |
| Renewal and deadline tracking | Yes, with reminders | Included |
| Full-text search | Yes, incl. OCR | Incl. OCR |
| AI | ||
| Metadata extraction on import | Yes, AI-powered | Included |
| Ask questions across the repository | Yes (AI assistant) | Included |
| Review against your playbook | Yes, custom playbooks | Included |
| Signatures | ||
| Signature levels | SES, AES, QES | Via DocuSign / Adobe Sign |
| Signing order | Yes | Via DocuSign |
| Security and commercials | ||
| EU hosting by default | Yes (EEA) | EU region available |
| Hosting regions | European Economic Area (AWS) | AWS (US, EU, CA, AU) |
| SOC 2 report | No | Type II |
| German interface | Yes (DE, EN) | Translation files |
| Public API | Business plan and up | REST API |
| CRM integrations | Salesforce, Pipedrive, HubSpot, Attio | Salesforce |
Each cell is checked against the vendor's own public pages. Links and check dates are in the references below.
Agiloft has no native e-signature. Contracts are signed through its DocuSign or Adobe Sign integration, and an Adobe Sign account used with Agiloft has to be dedicated to it. The signature levels you get therefore depend on the signing plan you licence separately. In fynk, contract management and signing sit in one plan, with SES, AES and QES available. If you already run DocuSign or Adobe Sign and are happy with it, the Agiloft setup costs you little. If you do not, fynk is one contract instead of two.
Price the DocuSign or Adobe Sign licence into the Agiloft total, and if you need QES, ask which signature levels the integration supports.
Agiloft’s own implementation timeline runs from discovery workshops in weeks 1 to 4 to go-live in week 14, and in return the platform is configured around your tables, workflows and approval routing. fynk is set up self-serve in minutes and live as soon as your templates are in. For organisations whose processes genuinely do not fit a standard tool, Agiloft’s configurability is worth the project. For everyone else, the project is the cost.
Write down the three processes that make your contracting unusual. If none of them breaks a standard workflow, you do not need a 14-week project.
Both products include AI extraction, questions across the repository and review against your playbooks. Agiloft says its AI is part of the CLM base package, and it also sells the same engine, Astra, as a standalone product with a free tier of 1,000 credits a month that works inside Microsoft Word. Agiloft’s setup documentation lists a separate ConvoAI licence as required to activate Ask AI, so check that it is in your quote. fynk includes AI credits on every plan, 150 per user per month on Essential. If your lawyers review in Word, Agiloft’s add-in is the stronger fit; if you want the questions answered over a repository that also holds the signatures, fynk is.
fynk hosts in the European Economic Area by default and ships German and English interfaces. Agiloft runs on AWS with regions in the US, Canada, Australia, Ireland and Germany, but does not state EU as the default, and its data processing addendum lists US processing for some components, including the Word services and the Adobe Sign integration. German is supplied as language files, while the text specific to your system has to be translated per system. For a DACH team, fynk wins this one. For a group that needs data held in the US, Canada or Australia, Agiloft does.
Entry prices as checked, and the mechanics underneath them, which matter more than the headline number.
| What you pay for | fynk | Agiloft |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per user, unlimited documents | Custom quote |
| Entry price | From €19 per user/month (annual) | On request |
| E-signature | CLM and signing in one plan | E-sign licensed separately |
| AI features | Included | Included |
| Free plan | Yes, 1 user | Astra AI only |
| Self-serve signup | Yes | Astra only |
| Time to go live | Minutes, self-serve | ~14 weeks |
| Where the bill grows | With headcount | Quote-based, pricing unit not published, plus a separate signing licence |
fynk's entry price is per user per month, billed annually, for Essential, its lowest paid plan. Agiloft CLM, the product a fynk buyer would compare against, is priced on request; Agiloft's only published prices are for its separate Astra AI product. Ask both vendors to quote your real team size and volume.
Leaving Agiloft is mostly a data project, because the system was configured around your process rather than delivered as a fixed product. The work sits in three places: the fields and workflows you built, the separate signing licence, and the Salesforce side that sales teams use every day.
Agiloft’s tables, fields and workflows were built for you, by your admins or an implementation partner, so nobody outside your team can tell which of them still matter. Before exporting anything, list the fields that reports, renewal alerts and approvals depend on, and the workflows that still run. That list is usually far shorter than the configuration, and it is the part you rebuild in fynk as metadata and approval paths. The rest is history to archive, not logic to recreate.
The documented route out is the API. Agiloft documents REST and SOAP APIs with OAuth 2.0 access, plus document actions such as OCR and format conversion, and together they can pull contract records with their attachments. Ask Agiloft or your partner whether your edition also offers a bulk export, and plan the extraction with whoever configured the system, because they know which tables hold the signed versions. Pull the PDFs together with their field values, then reconcile the count with Agiloft before the account is closed.
Agiloft signs through DocuSign or Adobe Sign, and an Adobe Sign account used with Agiloft must be dedicated to it. Leaving therefore touches two contracts with two renewal dates. Before either ends, check where the signature certificates for past agreements are kept, in the Agiloft record, in the signing account or in both, and export them from wherever they are. fynk includes SES, AES and QES in the plan, so the signing licence can end with Agiloft, unless other teams use that DocuSign account for their own work.
With Agiloft for Salesforce, reps request, review and track contracts without leaving Salesforce, so people who rarely open Agiloft itself are the first to notice it has gone. fynk connects to Salesforce from Essential, while the REST API and webhooks start on Business, which matters if Integration Hub recipes feed other systems today. Set a date from which new contracts start in fynk, and let anything already in approval or out for signature finish in Agiloft, so both flows get tested while the old one still works.
If your processes rest on custom tables and integrations that took months to build, if procurement requires a SOC 2 Type II report, or if your data has to stay in the US, Canada or Australia, the move costs more than it returns. fynk holds ISO 27001 but no SOC 2 report and hosts in the European Economic Area, so a switch closes none of those three gaps. In those cases Agiloft is the better fit, and it is better to settle that before the export starts than halfway through it.
"Don't underestimate the value of modern, intuitive usability. People say it's so nice to work with. It actually makes contract work fun. That makes adoption faster and that's why we trust fynk for our contract workflows across the whole company."
For contract management with signing built in, yes. For processes modelled in custom tables and workflows, for a SOC 2 Type II requirement, or for hosting in the US, Canada or Australia, Agiloft is the better fit.
Agiloft is an enterprise contract lifecycle management (CLM) system built on a configurable no-code platform, where customers adapt tables, workflows and layouts to their own process. It runs on AWS, signs through DocuSign or Adobe Sign, and adds AI contract review through its Astra product.
Agiloft does not publish CLM prices. Its pricing page is a contact form and does not state the unit the CLM is billed by either, so the figure comes from a quote after a demo. Ask for the quote to itemise the CLM itself and the ConvoAI licence that Agiloft's setup guide lists as required for Ask AI, and ask whether the implementation of about 14 weeks is charged on top. The DocuSign or Adobe Sign licence for signing is a separate cost, and Agiloft's only published prices are for its standalone Astra AI product.
Astra is Agiloft's AI contract review product. Sold on its own, it has a free tier with 1,000 credits a month and up to three custom playbooks, Pro from $120 a month, and Advanced on request. Current Agiloft CLM customers get Astra through the AI on the Inside package.
fynk publishes its prices: Essential starts at €19 per user per month, billed annually, with unlimited documents under fair use. Agiloft CLM is priced on request, and signing needs a separate DocuSign or Adobe Sign licence. Get a quote and add the signing licence before comparing.
Not natively. Agiloft CLM integrates with DocuSign and Adobe Sign for signing, so the available signature levels depend on that plan. fynk includes SES, AES and QES in the same subscription as contract management.
fynk is set up self-serve in minutes, where Agiloft's own implementation plan puts go-live at week 14. What takes time is mapping the custom tables and workflows you configured in Agiloft onto fynk templates, approvals and metadata, and pulling records and attachments out through Agiloft's APIs or a partner. Run both systems in parallel for a month.
Still have questions?
Import what you signed last quarter and ask fynk a question about it. Faster than any comparison table.
No setup headaches
Go live in days, not quarters
No lock-in
Full export anytime
No hidden fees
Signatures included, no envelope fee
