fynk vs ContractHero.

Both read your contracts with AI, track deadlines and host in Europe. They differ in where drafting and negotiation happen, which features sit in add-ons, and whether you see a price before a sales call. Compared across the archive, AI, signatures, hosting and cost.

By Felix Scholz, fynkLast reviewed
fynk

fynk

Contract management with e-signature and an AI assistant built in.

Founded
2022, Vienna
Category
CLM plus e-signature
Hosting
European Economic Area (AWS)
Signature levels
SES, AES, QES
Pricing model
Per user, unlimited documents
Best for
European teams that want contracts, AI and eIDAS signing (up to QES) in one system with transparent per-user pricing

ContractHero

German contract management platform with AI data extraction, deadline tracking and hosting in Frankfurt.

Founded
2020
Category
Contract management
Hosting
Germany (Frankfurt)
Signature levels
AES, QES (add-on)
Pricing model
Package with user bundle
Best for
DACH mid-sized companies and groups that mainly need a structured, searchable contract archive with deadline control

Choose fynk if

  • You draft and negotiate with the counterparty in the browser rather than in Word.
  • You want approval workflows as part of the plan, not as an add-on to it.
  • You want to ask questions across the whole archive inside the app, and review contracts against your own playbook.
  • You want SES, AES and QES available on every plan, the free plan included.
  • You want to see published prices and start self-serve, without a demo first.
  • You want an MCP server from the Essential plan that can also draft and move contracts, not only read them.

Choose ContractHero if

  • Your main problem is an existing, scattered archive that needs structure and deadline control.
  • Your legal team drafts and redlines in Microsoft Word and wants to keep doing that.
  • Your data has to be stored and processed in Germany specifically, not just in the EEA.
  • You want a guided onboarding with data migration run by the vendor's team.
  • You run a group and need multi-entity separation, which is included in Enterprise.
  • You need the REST API and webhooks on the mid-tier package you are buying anyway.
Feature by feature

fynk vs ContractHero: the full comparison.

Grouped by the areas that decide these deals. ContractHero cells describe the Professional package, the one most mid-sized teams would buy. Where a feature exists but costs extra or works differently, it is marked partial.

CapabilityfynkContractHero
Contract lifecycle
Central repositoryYes (Document hub)Yes
Full-text search with OCRYes, incl. OCRYes, with OCR
Templates with locked clausesYesTemplates, no locking
Redlining and negotiationYesVia Word add-in
Approval workflowsYesAdd-on on Professional
Renewal and deadline trackingYes, with remindersYes
AI
Metadata extraction on importYes, AI-poweredIncluded
Ask questions across the repositoryYes (AI assistant)Via MCP add-on
Review against your playbookYes, custom playbooksNot listed
MCP server for AI agentsYes, from EssentialAdd-on
Signatures
Signature levelsSES, AES, QESAES, QES (add-on)
Qualified electronic signature (QES)YesAdd-on
Security and commercials
EU hosting by defaultYes (EEA)Yes (Germany)
Data stored in GermanyEEA (AWS)Frankfurt, Germany
ISO 27001YesYes
Public APIBusiness plan and upProfessional and up

Each cell is checked against the vendor's own public pages and help centre. Links and check dates are in the references below.

Where fynk and ContractHero actually differ.

Archive first, or the whole lifecycle.

ContractHero is built around the repository. Contracts are uploaded or imported, AI fills the fields, and reminders and tasks follow from the dates. Drafting starts at Professional, from templates or through a Microsoft Word add-in that handles formatting, redlining and comments and syncs the result back. ContractHero does not describe negotiating with the counterparty inside the product. fynk covers the same archive work and adds a browser editor where drafting, redlining and approvals happen in one place. For a Word-centred legal team that mostly needs its archive under control, ContractHero wins this one. For teams that want negotiation out of email attachments, fynk does.

What to do with that

Map where your contracts are written today. If the answer is Word and nobody wants to change it, weigh that above every other row.

What is in the package and what is added to it.

On ContractHero Professional, advanced electronic signatures, templates and the REST API are included. QES, approval workflows, multi-entity separation, the MCP Connector and custom ERP or CRM integrations are paid add-ons. In fynk, SES, AES and QES are available on every plan, and approvals, playbook review and the AI assistant are part of the subscription. fynk has add-ons of its own: guided onboarding is paid, and heavy AI use can need extra credits on top of the monthly allowance. On what the plan covers without extras, fynk wins.

What to do with that

Ask ContractHero for a quote that includes every add-on your process needs, then compare it with fynk's plan at the same headcount.

A price you can see, or a price you are quoted.

ContractHero shows every package as on request and recommends a demo to decide which one fits. Its help centre gives Essential from €390 per month, billed annually, for 5 users and 500 contracts, without e-signature, templates or API. Professional and Enterprise have no public price. fynk publishes its prices, from €19 per user per month on annual billing, and has a free single-user plan. The exception is fynk Pro, where SAML SSO, SCIM and a custom SLA sit, which is priced on request too. On transparency fynk wins; if you want the vendor to scope the project with you from the first call, ContractHero’s process is built for that.

AI that reads, and AI you can ask.

Extraction is a draw. Both read every contract on import, including scanned PDFs, and both put AI analysis on every plan. ContractHero adds summaries with jump to source and custom prompts per field. The difference is in asking questions. ContractHero answers portfolio questions through its MCP Connector inside an external assistant such as Claude, read-only and as a paid add-on. fynk has an assistant in the product that answers across the repository, reviews contracts against your playbooks, and ships an MCP server from Essential that can also draft from templates and move contracts forward. fynk’s AI draws on monthly credits per user, so check the allowance against your volume. On asking and reviewing, fynk wins.

Cost model

ContractHero pricing vs fynk pricing as you grow.

Published prices where they exist, and the mechanics underneath them, which matter more than the headline number.

What you pay forfynkContractHero
Pricing modelPer user, unlimited documentsPackage with user bundle
Price of the compared plan€39 per user/month (annual)On request
UsersUnlimited, billed per user15 included, more as add-on
ContractsUnlimitedUnlimited
Lowest published priceFree plan for 1 user, paid from €19 per user/month (annual)Essential from €390 per month (annual), help centre only
Free planYes, 1 userNo
Self-serve purchaseYesSales-led
Guided onboardingPaid add-onImplementation team, average go-live in 20 days
AI features fynk: 150 AI credits per user per month on Essential, 250 on Business.IncludedAll plans
Priced as add-onsGuided onboarding, extra AI creditsQES, approvals, MCP Connector, multi-entity, custom integrations
Where the bill growsWith headcount and AI usageWith package size, extra users and add-ons

Compared plans: fynk Business, the plan that adds the REST API, per user per month on annual billing, and ContractHero Professional, the package that adds signing, templates and the API. ContractHero publishes no price for Professional, so none is estimated here. Ask both vendors to quote your real headcount and volume.

In practice

Switching from ContractHero to fynk in practice.

ContractHero offers two export routes on every plan, so the archive itself is the predictable part of this move. The effort sits around it: the renewal date, the signature evidence, the integrations, and the legal team’s habit of drafting in Word.

ContractHero’s export comes in two halves.

Every ContractHero plan includes a bulk download of the original PDFs as a ZIP file and a structured export as CSV, PDF or Excel. The ZIP carries no field data, so run the Excel export as well, because that is where the values your team has already checked are kept. On Professional and Enterprise, the REST API also exposes contracts, documents, contacts and tasks, which helps with large archives or when open tasks should come along. fynk reads each PDF again on import and extracts parties, dates, values and clauses, so the Excel file becomes the check rather than the input: compare it with the re-read values, starting with the contracts whose notice periods come up next.

Keep the signature evidence, and work back from the renewal date.

ContractHero processes FES signatures through its partner Dropbox Sign and QES through eideasy, which connects to trust service providers such as D-Trust. Ask ContractHero whether the ZIP contains the signature evidence for each contract signed in the product or whether it has to be requested separately, and test the answer on a few samples. ContractHero usually bills annually in advance, so schedule the export, the check and the notice to finish before the renewal date rather than after it.

HubSpot, webhooks and custom integrations need a new home.

If ContractHero set up its two-way HubSpot sync for you, or you run webhooks and the REST API on Professional, write down what each of them triggers before you move. In fynk, native HubSpot, the REST API and webhooks start on Business, so an Essential plan would not cover them, while Salesforce and Pipedrive connect from Essential. ERP, BI or Salesforce connections bought through ContractHero’s custom integrations add-on have to be rebuilt, and whoever owns them should join the project from the first week.

Legal teams on ContractHero’s Word add-in draft, redline and comment in Word, then sync the result back as a PDF. In fynk, templates live in the browser editor, and negotiation happens in the shared document through suggested edits, comments and tracked changes. The handful of templates behind most contracts is quick to rebuild. The real change is habit, so start with one contract type and the people who draft it most often, and widen from there.

When staying on ContractHero is the right call.

If your legal team will keep drafting in Word, if a policy requires storage and processing in Germany rather than anywhere in the EEA, or if the group-wide permissions and multi-entity separation you built in ContractHero work, the move costs more than it returns. fynk hosts in the European Economic Area on AWS, not specifically in Frankfurt, and a switch does not change that. In those cases ContractHero stays the better fit, and checking these three points first spares you an export you would not need.

"Don't underestimate the value of modern, intuitive usability. People say it's so nice to work with. It actually makes contract work fun. That makes adoption faster and that's why we trust fynk for our contract workflows across the whole company."

Elisa Prößdorf Legal Solutions Manager at Unite
References

Where these figures come from.

  • fynk [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
  • ContractHero [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]

Spotted a figure that has moved? Tell us at [email protected] and we will re-check the row.

fynk vs ContractHero: frequently asked questions.

  • For the archive, AI extraction, deadline tracking and e-signature, yes, and fynk adds in-app negotiation, approvals and playbook review. Check two things first: fynk hosts in the European Economic Area on AWS rather than specifically in Germany, and a drafting process built on ContractHero's Word add-in will move into a browser editor.

  • It cannot be said from public prices alone. ContractHero prices Professional and Enterprise on request, as packages with a bundled number of users and paid add-ons for QES, approvals and the MCP Connector. fynk publishes per-user prices, from €19 per user per month on annual billing. Get a ContractHero quote for your headcount and add-ons, then compare it with the fynk plan you would need.

  • ContractHero's pricing page shows all three packages as on request. The only published figure is in its help centre: Essential, with 5 users and 500 contracts but no e-signature, templates or API, from €390 per month, usually billed annually in advance. Professional (15 users, unlimited contracts) and Enterprise (50 users) are quoted after a demo. The bill then depends on the users bundled into the package, extra users or contracts booked on top, and add-ons such as an annual QES signature volume, multi-entity separation on Professional or custom ERP and CRM integrations.

  • Yes. ContractHero stores and processes data in Frankfurt, Germany. fynk hosts in the European Economic Area on AWS. Both hold ISO 27001 certification, and neither lists a SOC 2 report.

  • fynk's setup is self-serve and takes minutes, so the archive sets the timeline. ContractHero's ZIP download holds the original PDFs but no field data, so export the Excel file as well and keep both together for the import. Run both systems in parallel for a month, and plan the cutover around ContractHero's usual annual prepayment.

Still have questions?

Compare it against your own contracts.

Import what you signed last quarter and ask fynk a question about it. Faster than any comparison table.