Legalese: what it means, with examples in plain English
Felix Scholz
Updated · Published · 11 min read

Legalese is the formal, technical and often old-fashioned language used in contracts, laws and court documents. It is known for long sentences, Latin and French phrases, archaic words like hereinafter and whereas, and repeated word pairs like null and void. It aims to be precise, but for most readers it is simply hard to understand.
If you work with legal documents or handle contract management, you will run into legalese every day. This guide explains what it means, translates the most common legalese terms into plain English, and shows you how to read it and how to avoid writing it.

When one person's work terminology is another one's riddle.
A fun fact to start: the clue “creditor in legalese” turns up in crossword puzzles like the New York Times Crossword. The answer is “obligee.” Nobody outside a law office says obligee, which is exactly the point.
What is legalese? Meaning and definition
Legalese is the specialised language of the legal profession. Lawyers, judges and legislators use it in contracts, statutes, court rulings and official letters. It is also called legal jargon, legal English or legal speak, and in a more critical tone, lawyerese or gobbledygook.
The word itself is a combination of legal and the suffix -ese, the same ending used in journalese or bureaucratese to poke fun at the typical (and often impenetrable) style of a profession. The earliest recorded use of the word dates from 1911.
How do you pronounce legalese? Legalese is pronounced lee-guh-LEEZ, with the stress on the last syllable. Some dictionaries also list lee-guh-LEES.
What does legalese mean in practice?
Legalese tries to cover every possible situation and leave no room for interpretation. That goal is reasonable. The problem is the method: more words, longer sentences and older vocabulary. The result is text that is technically thorough but practically unreadable for anyone without legal training.
Think about the last time you read a contract. Did it feel like wading through a swamp of words? That is legalese at work.
Typical features of legalese
You can usually spot legalese by these features:
- Archaic words: hereby, herein, whereas, aforementioned, heretofore.
- Latin and French terms: inter alia, bona fide, force majeure, mutatis mutandis.
- Doublets and triplets: two or three words that mean the same thing, such as null and void, cease and desist, terms and conditions or give, devise and bequeath.
- Very long sentences: one sentence per clause, sometimes over 100 words, with nested exceptions.
- Nouns instead of verbs: “make payment” instead of “pay”, “give consideration to” instead of “consider”.
- Passive voice: “the goods shall be delivered” instead of “the seller will deliver the goods”.
- The word “shall”: used to mean must, will or may, depending on the drafter.
- Abstract party names: “the party of the first part” instead of the actual names.
Why understanding legalese matters
Even if you would never write it, you need to read it:
- Clarity: you know exactly which terms and conditions you are agreeing to.
- Compliance: you meet your obligations and avoid legal issues you did not see coming.
- Negotiation: you can push back on a clause once you understand what it really says.
If you manage contracts, understanding legalese helps you spot unfair terms or obligations that could hurt your business.
Legalese examples: 20 common terms in plain English
Here are the legalese words and phrases you are most likely to find in contracts, with a plain English translation.
| Legalese | Plain English |
|---|---|
| hereinafter | from now on, called |
| hereby | (usually delete it) |
| herein / hereunder | in this contract / under this contract |
| whereas | because, background |
| notwithstanding | despite, even if |
| in witness whereof | as proof, the parties sign below |
| pursuant to | under, according to |
| prior to | before |
| forthwith | immediately |
| aforementioned / aforesaid | this, that, mentioned above |
| null and void | invalid, has no effect |
| inter alia | among other things |
| in lieu of | instead of |
| indemnify and hold harmless | cover the other party’s losses |
| force majeure | events outside anyone’s control |
| time is of the essence | deadlines are strict |
| mutatis mutandis | with the necessary changes |
| save as otherwise provided | unless this contract says otherwise |
| party of the first part | the actual name, e.g. “the Supplier” |
| shall | must (for obligations), will (for facts) |
Some of these have a real legal function and appear as clauses of their own, for example recitals (the “whereas” section), force majeure and indemnification and hold harmless.
Before and after: legalese sentences translated
- Affidavit:
- Legalese: “I, the undersigned, hereby depose and state under penalty of perjury that the facts contained herein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.”
- Plain English: “I swear that everything in this document is true, as far as I know.”
- Indemnity:
- Legalese: “The indemnifying party agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the indemnified party from any and all claims, damages, liabilities, losses, costs, and expenses arising out of or related to the performance of this agreement.”
- Plain English: “You agree to protect me from any problems, costs, or damages that happen because of this agreement.”
- Jurisdiction:
- Legalese: “The parties hereby submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of [specific location] for the resolution of any disputes arising out of or in connection with this agreement.”
- Plain English: “Any legal disputes about this contract will be handled in the courts of [specific location].”
- Payment:
- Legalese: “The aforementioned party of the first part shall heretofore be responsible for the payment of all sums due hereunder.”
- Plain English: “The buyer will pay all amounts due under this contract.”
Knowing that “indemnity” means covering someone else’s losses tells you a clause carries real financial risk. See how these work in a full contract in our indemnity and governing law and jurisdiction clauses.
“In witness whereof” meaning
“In witness whereof” is one of the most recognisable pieces of legalese. It appears just before the signatures and means “as evidence of this, the parties sign below.” A typical example:
“In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.”
In plain English: “The parties have signed this agreement on the date shown at the top.” The phrase itself adds no legal effect. Signing is what shows that the parties agree, so a contract does not need these words to be enforceable and a modern contract can safely drop them. Its counterpart at the top of one-sided documents such as powers of attorney and bills of sale is know all men by these presents, an opening formula that can go just as safely.
“Hereinafter” meaning
“Hereinafter” means “from this point on in the document.” It introduces a short name for a party or a term, for example: “ABC Software GmbH (hereinafter referred to as the Supplier).” A plain English version simply writes: “ABC Software GmbH (the Supplier).” The meaning is identical.
Legalese in everyday legal documents
Legalese is not limited to complex commercial contracts. You will find it in:
- Lease agreements: “lessee” (the person renting) and “lessor” (the property owner).
- Wills: “bequeath” (to leave personal property to someone) and “executor” (the person responsible for carrying out the will).
- Employment contracts: “at-will employment” (employment that either side can end at any time) and “non-compete clause” (a restriction on working for competitors).
- Terms of service and insurance policies: often the longest legalese most people ever agree to.
Why do lawyers use legalese?
If legalese is so hard to read, why does it still exist? There are a few reasons, some historical and some practical.
- History: after the Norman Conquest of 1066, English courts were conducted in Law French for almost 300 years, until the Pleading in English Act of 1362, and court records stayed in Latin until the 1730s. Many terms survived, and so did doublets that paired an English word with its French or Latin equivalent, like will and testament or goods and chattels.
- Precedent: phrases that courts have already interpreted feel safe. Changing the wording could invite a new argument about what it means.
- Terms of art: some words, like consideration or indemnify, have a precise legal meaning that a casual synonym would not capture.
- Copy and paste: contracts are often built from older contracts. Old wording carries forward simply because nobody removes it.
- Habit and signalling: legalese can make a document look official and a drafter look expert, even when it adds nothing.
Only the third reason holds up well. Terms of art should stay. Almost everything else can be written more simply without changing the legal effect.
Why legalese is a problem
Unnecessary complexity
The main criticism of legalese is that it adds complexity without adding meaning:
- Accessibility: people without legal training cannot fully understand what they sign.
- Time: reading and reviewing dense text takes longer and slows down every deal.
- Intimidation: complex language discourages people from asking questions or negotiating.
Saying “prior to the commencement of the contractual obligations” instead of “before the contract starts” helps no one.
Misunderstandings and disputes
Ironically, legalese can create the very ambiguity it is supposed to prevent:
- Misinterpretation: readers misread complex clauses, which leads to unintended consequences or disputes.
- Overlooked details: important obligations get lost in a 120-word sentence.
- Ambiguous words: “shall” can mean must, will, should or even may, and that ambiguity has fuelled contract disputes for generations. Drafting experts like Bryan Garner recommend replacing it with “must”.
Consider a contract that states: “The party of the first part shall indemnify and hold harmless the party of the second part.” Without knowing what “indemnify” and “hold harmless” mean, a reader might not realize they are taking on significant financial responsibility.
Wordy phrases and their simpler alternatives
| Legalese | Plain English |
|---|---|
| prior to the occurrence of | before |
| concerning the matter of | about |
| due to the fact that | because |
| in the event that | if |
| at this point in time | now |
| for the duration of | during |
| with regard to | about |
How to simplify legalese
Simplifying legal language is not about dumbing it down. It is about making the obligations clear to everyone who signs. These techniques work for contracts, policies and letters:
- Use plain words: “start” instead of “commence”, “end” instead of “terminate” where the legal meaning is the same.
- Shorten sentences: aim for one idea per sentence and break long clauses into lists.
- Drop doublets: “void” says everything “null and void” says.
- Use active voice: “The contractor will complete the work” is clearer than “The work will be completed by the contractor.”
- Use names, not formulas: “the Supplier” and “the Customer” instead of “the party of the first part.”
- Use “must” for obligations: and keep “will” for things that happen, so no reader has to guess.
- Define terms once: give a clear definition for any legal term you have to keep, then use it consistently.
- Keep terms of art: plain language does not mean removing precise legal concepts. It means removing the padding around them.
Good legal design takes this further with clear structure, headings and visual cues.
The plain language movement
The push away from legalese is decades old. In the UK, Chrissie Maher launched the Plain English Campaign in 1979 by shredding government forms in Parliament Square. In the US, New York has required plain language in consumer contracts and residential leases since 1978, the SEC published A Plain English Handbook for disclosure documents in 1998, and the Plain Writing Act of 2010 requires federal agencies to write public documents in clear language.
Benefits of plain language in legal documents
- Clarity: less risk of misinterpretation, so everyone understands the terms.
- Speed: simpler documents are faster to read, review and negotiate.
- Trust: transparent language shows that you are not hiding anything.
- Accessibility: the document works for everyone, not only those with legal training.
A lease written in plain language, for example, means tenants actually know their rights and obligations, which reduces disputes later.
How to read a legal document full of legalese
When you cannot rewrite a contract, you still have to understand it. This approach makes it manageable:
- Start with the definitions. Most contracts define their key terms near the beginning. Read them first, because every capitalised word later depends on them.
- Read the recitals. The “whereas” section explains the background and why the contract exists.
- Find the obligations. Look for “shall”, “must” and “agrees to”. These sentences tell you who has to do what.
- Check the high-risk clauses. Payment, term and termination, liability, indemnity and governing law are where the money and risk sit.
- Translate sentence by sentence. Rewrite long sentences in your own words. If you cannot, that is the part to ask about.
- Ask questions before you sign. Anything unclear is a negotiation point, not a detail.
Can AI translate legalese?
Yes, AI tools are now a practical legalese translator for a first read. You can paste a clause and ask what it means in plain English, or ask what a contract says about termination or liability. Treat the answer as a reading aid, not legal advice, and check it against the original wording.
In fynk, you can ask your contract questions in plain language and get a straight answer back, instead of decoding the jargon line by line. An AI contract summary gives you a plain-language overview of every contract you import.
Avoid it when possible, understand it when necessary
Legalese is not going away overnight, but it does not have to be a barrier. Learn to recognize the common terms, read contracts in a structured way, and write your own documents in plain language wherever the legal meaning allows. Your contracts will be clearer, faster to agree and less likely to end in a dispute.
FAQs
Legalese is the complicated language lawyers use in contracts, laws and court documents. It uses long sentences, old-fashioned words like hereinafter and whereas, Latin phrases and repeated word pairs, which makes it hard for non-lawyers to understand.
Legalese is pronounced lee-guh-LEEZ, with the stress on the last syllable. It combines the word legal with the suffix -ese, as in journalese.
Common synonyms for legalese are legal jargon, legal English, legal speak, legal language and lawyerese. Critics also call it gobbledygook. The opposite of legalese is plain language or plain English.
A classic example is: The parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. In plain English this means: The parties signed this agreement on the date at the top. Other examples are hereinafter, notwithstanding, pursuant to and null and void.
No. Lawyers and judges use it most, but legalese also appears in government forms, insurance policies, leases, terms of service and contracts drafted by non-lawyers who copy older templates. Anyone who signs a contract regularly runs into it.
Yes. A contract does not need legalese to be valid. What matters is that the terms are clear and the parties agree to them. Plain language contracts are just as enforceable, and some jurisdictions even require plain language for consumer contracts. Keep legal terms of art where they carry a specific meaning.
Please keep in mind that none of the content on our blog should be considered legal advice. We understand the complexities and nuances of legal matters, and as much as we strive to ensure our information is accurate and useful, it cannot replace the personalized advice of a qualified legal professional.
Get a regular dose of insightful contract management content
Take control of your agreements. Move your business forward.
Run agreements the way they should run: fast, clear, and on your terms.
No setup headaches
Go live in days, not quarters
No lock-in
Full export anytime
No hidden fees
Signatures included, no envelope fee


